目录
When Is a Causative Situation not Mapped to a Causative Construction Proper? The Case of Hupa
| 作者: | Escamilla,R. | PDF下载 |
| 工作单位: | University of Central Arkansas, USA | |
| 期数: | 2021年总第14期 | |
| 页码: | 101-112 | |
| 出版日期: | 2021-06-30 | |
| 摘要: | This work interrogates why certain real-world events that meet criteria for being considered causative events cannot be expressed using Hupa’s morphological or syntactic causative constructions, but must be encoded using one of two periphrastic constructions in which the Causer or cause is not marked as an argument. Based on fieldwork with a native speaker, I probe into these two periphrastic constructions in depth, accounting for their distributions through an appeal to Næss’s (2007) account of semantic transitivity. |
|
| 关键词: | Hupa, Dene, causative, semantics, typology | |
| 文章编号: | doi: 10.26478/ja2021.9.14.5 | |
| 参考文献: | Comrie, B. 1981. Language Universals and Linguistic Typology: Syntax and morphology [M]. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Dixon, R. M. W. 2000. A Typology of Causatives: Form, syntax and meaning [A]. In R. M. W. Dixon & A.Y. Aikhenvald (eds.). Changing Valency: Case studies in transitivity [C]. New York: Cambridge University Press, 30-83. Dryer, M. S. 1989. Large Linguistic Areas and Language Sampling [J]. Studies in Language, 13:257-292. Escamilla, R. 2012a. The Syntactic Causative Construction in Hupa (California Athabaskan) [A]. Rice Working Papers in Linguistics, 3 [C]. Escamilla, R. 2012b. An Updated Typology of Causative Constructions: Form-function mappings in Hupa (California Athabaskan), Chungli Ao (Tibeto-Burman) and beyond [D]. PhD Dissertation. Berkeley:University of California. Gil, D. 2001. Escaping Eurocentrism: Fieldwork as a process of unlearning [A]. In P. Newman & M. Ratliff (eds.). Linguistic Fieldwork [C]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 102-132. Golla, V. 1970. Hupa Grammar [D]. PhD Dissertation. Berkeley: University of California. Hetterle, K. 2015. Adverbial Clauses in Cross-Linguistic Perspective [M]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Hopper, P. J. & S. A. Thompson. 1980. Transitivity in Grammar and Discourse [J]. Language, 56(2):251-299. Huang, S-P. & L. I-W. Su. 2005. Iconicity as Evidenced in Saisiyat Linguistic Coding of Causative Events.[J]. Oceanic Linguistics, 44(2):341-356. Næss, Å. 2007. Prototypical Transitivity [M]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. Pardeshi, P. 2016. A Functional Account of Marathi’s Voice Phenomena: Passives and causatives in Marathi [M]. Leiden/Boston: Brill. Rice, K. 2000. Voice and Valency in the Athabaskan Family [A]. In R. M. W. Dixon & A. Y. Aikhenvald (eds.). Changing Valency: Case studies in transitivity [C]. New York: Cambridge University Press,173-235. Sapir, E. & V. Golla. 2001. Hupa Texts, with Notes and Lexicon [A]. In V. Golla & S. O’Neill (eds.). The Collected Works of Edward Sapir [C]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 14:19-1011. Shibatani, M. 1976. Causativization [A]. In M. Shibatani (ed.). Syntax and Semantics [C]. New York: Academic Press, 5:239-294. Song, J. J. 1996. Causatives and Causation: A universal-typological perspective [M]. New York: Addison Wesley Longman Limited. |
|
